Do You Have a Defective Stryker LFIT-V40 Hip Implant?
You may want to get in touch with a mass tort attorney!
Stryker hip replacement surgeries have been popular medical procedures that were supposed to increase mobility and improve life quality. The type of implant being used, however, determines the outcome of the surgery. Unfortunately, several companies have made defective hip implants through the years and the Stryker LFIT-V40 is one of them. The stryker LFIT v40 femoral head recall has many lawsuits against it. If you or someone you know has had a Stryker hip replacement associated with pain, we have tort lawyers that can help. Contact a Burnetti P.A. Stryker hip lawyer to to see if you have a case against the Stryker LFIT V40 hip replacement. A stryker hip attorney can answer any questions you may have a bout litigation against the Stryker LFIT-V40 hip implant.
The use of defective medical equipment is reason enough to take a company to court. Whenever mass defects occur, the number of people experiencing the negative consequences will be significant. A mass tort lawsuit could be launched under the circumstances. The experience and knowledge of a mass tort attorney will be of paramount importance to guarantee a positive outcome.
The Hip Implants Stryker LFIT-V40 Mass Tort
Due to the number of people who experienced problems following the implantation of a Stryker LFIT V40 femoral head, a mass tort petition was submitted in March 2017. The aim of the petition was to centralize all claims into a mass tort. This way, the amount of time needed to review the case and come up with a decision will be reduced significantly.
In August 2016, Stryker issued an urgent medical device recall notification. The company reported that taper lock failure was experienced multiple times, increasing the risk of the following issues:
- Femoral head dislocation in the aftermath of the surgery
- The formation of excess metal debris due to friction
- Insufficient soft tissue tension
- Excessive wear debris
- Insufficient ROM
The medical problems that hip implant patients have suffered as a result of these complications include loss of mobility, pain, inflammation, dislocation, leg length discrepancies, joint instability, and periprosthetic fractures. Because of these issues, revision surgery was often required.
As per the notification sent to surgeons in the summer of 2016, patients who have the respective Stryker implant need to be informed about the potential issues and monitored.
As of February 2017, Stryker is the target of 1,800 lawsuits. The LFIT V40 femoral head is quite popular because it’s often used with the company’s Accolade hip replacement system. In addition, it is compatible with various other models and brands of hip replacement systems.
The current medical recall applies to heads manufactured prior to 2011. Because of the big number of affected individuals and the company’s extensive distribution network, warnings have been issued in countries outside the US, as well. The Canadian public health authority issued an official recall. In Australia, a hazard alert was also circulated regarding the use of the LFIT-V40 femoral head.
Regarding Stryker Lfit V40 Femoral Head Hip Implant Recall Can You Start a Lawsuit Yourself OR…
Should you contact a mass tort attorney to help you with a hip implant lawsuit?
A mass tort action is a civil lawsuit that involves many plaintiffs. It often stems from the use of defective products or pharmaceuticals causing severe side effects.
All of the claims in a mass tort should focus on the same product or service. While the claims are similar or identical in many cases, they are viewed individually. The compensation that each plaintiff is entitled to for pain and suffering will depend on the circumstances. Thus, the outcome of the individual cases in the mass tort lawsuit could be different.
Whenever the mass tort action is approved, the case will be assigned to one judge. This ensures faster processing of the multiple complex cases. In addition, the mass tort attorneys representing the different plaintiffs can cooperate with each other when it comes to gathering evidence and exchanging important information.
If you have suffered injuries, pain or medical treatments that could have been avoided and these consequences result from the use of a medical device, you may have reason enough to launch a lawsuit. In cases where multiple individuals experience the same issues as a result of using the same medical device, a mass tort action may be initiated.
If you have had a hip implant with a femoral head like the Stryker LFIT-V40 and it was manufactured prior to 2011, you may have a reason enough to go to court. Some of the issues and complications you may eventually experience because of the faulty hip implant include:
- Tissue swelling and inflammation
- Difficulty moving around or a complete mobility loss
- Bone fractures
- Joint instability
- Joint dislocation
A medical professional will be capable of telling you whether the hip implant is the cause of these problems. If this is the case, you should definitely get in touch with a mass tort attorney in Orlando.
Compensation for the Pain and Suffering Caused by Defective stryker hip replacements Implants
This is not the first time that Stryker faces mass tort action.
In November 2014, the company settled nearly 3,000 cases involving the use of the Rejuvenate Hip Stem and ABG II. Patients that had to undergo a revision surgery because of the implant received 300,000 dollars and Stryker agreed to provide additional compensation to the patients that needed to have the implant removed altogether.
Legal action is still ongoing in the case of the LFIT-V40 femoral heads. The claim is that the femoral heads are defective, thus prone to corrosion, release of metal ions, fretting and fluid collection in the specific body region.
Whenever a hip implant necessitates a revision surgery, you are entitled to financial compensation for the pain, suffering and additional medical expenses. For the purpose, you will need to get in touch with a mass tort attorney in Lakeland, Orlando or Tampa as soon as possible.
Personalized and adequate representation in a mass tort lawsuit is incredibly important. As already mentioned, the individual compensation that plaintiffs are entitled to will vary. This is the main difference between mass torts and class action. Thus, the experience and strategic thinking of every single legal representative will matter.
The benefits of choosing the right mass tort attorney are numerous. A few of the key advantages to consider include the following:
- Adequate information: can you participate in mass tort action? What is the statute of limitations? Is it too late to join mass tort action? Talking to a lawyer who handles cases in this judicial area is the best way to gain access to reliable information. You will be told about the strength of your case, some of the hindrances you may face along the way and the type of compensation to expect in the case of a positive outcome.
- Claim investigation and evidence collection: the strength of your claim matters, especially when you are facing a large corporation with limitless resources. A mass tort attorney will talk to your physician, collect the necessary medical records and compile additional evidence of the problems you experienced as a result of getting a defective implant. The more evidence you have, the stronger your mass tort claim is going to be.
- Negotiation and courtroom experience: mass tort cases can be very complex. There will usually be thousands of claims. The defendant’s legal team will be responsible for minimizing the responsibility of their client. Thus, an attorney that specializes in the field of mass tort action will know how to follow necessary procedures and how to negotiate for the purpose of reaching a settlement out of court.
Whenever the mass tort attorney does a good job, you will get a range of potential damages. The most common ones include coverage for the additional medical expenses, compensation for pain and suffering, as well as for past and future lost income.
Major corporations should be held accountable for failures that affect human lives. Unfortunately, this is often difficult for the individual who does not have the knowledge or the financial resources to lead a lengthy legal battle. The good news is that mass tort action is designed for the specific purpose. Finding a passionate and committed lawyer who offers cost-efficient solutions to their clients is one of the essentials for making the most of the opportunity.
Defective Stryker LFIT-V40 Hip Implants – We Can Help!
Have you had to undergo revision surgery because of the Stryker LFIT-V40 femoral head? Did it cause prolonged periods of pain, immobility and an inability to work? If so, you should get in touch with the Burnetti, P.A. mass tort attorneys.
Under US regulations, manufacturers have the responsibility to ensure the safe and efficient functioning of their products. Whenever they fail doing so, they jeopardize lives and should be held accountable. Some of the issues covered by product liability regulations include defective designs, poor manufacturing processes, confusing instructions, faulty assembly, lack of safety testing, inadequate labeling and the use of hazardous materials in the manufacturing process.
There are many factors that need to be considered in the case of defective medical equipment. When it comes to products like Stryker LFIT-V40, legal action could be initiated immediately. The official medical recall provides reason enough to doubt the safety of the product.
Do not hesitate to call Burnetti, P.A. if you have had a Stryker hip implant or if you are interested in knowing the details about the Stryker LFIT V40 femoral head recall. Call us today at 1-888-BURNETTI (1-888-287-6388) to schedule a NO OBLIGATION FREE first consultation. This is your chance to ask questions about the Stryker hip replacements hip implants or other defective medical products and to understand the options ahead of you. Call now 888-287-6388.